Los Angeles County declines to force condom use in porn films |
|
Los Angeles County officials Tuesday rebuffed demands from an AIDS activist group that the county immediately require performers in porn films to use condoms.
Rong-Gong Lin II | Los Angeles Times | Published: 02/04/2010 07:25
|
County officials said the California Legislature would need to approve legislation requiring condom use for pornography shoots. They said it would be difficult to try to regulate the porn industry through the county's Public Health Department.
"It is very, very difficult to implement. There are roughly 200 production companies with about . . . 1,200 actors," said Dr. Jonathan Fielding, the county's public health chief. "All you need is a room and a camera and a bed, basically, to do this kind of shoot, and we have no ability to police this."
Fielding said it would be difficult for public health officials to prove if the movies were produced in L.A. County or elsewhere because producers often do not apply for filming licenses. In a memo to supervisors on Sept. 17, health officials warned that such an effort would be costly because the Public Health Department would need to identify filming sites and monitor compliance, which would require significant staff time.
"We worked closely with county counsel trying to see if there's some other way that we could effectively do this under existing authority, and . . . basically, we're unlikely to have an effective approach to prevent them from acquiring preventable STDs," Fielding said Tuesday. "It's very disturbing to come to that conclusion, but we also have to be realistic."
"It is very, very difficult to implement. There are roughly 200 production companies with about . . . 1,200 actors," said Dr. Jonathan Fielding, the county's public health chief. "All you need is a room and a camera and a bed, basically, to do this kind of shoot, and we have no ability to police this."
Fielding said it would be difficult for public health officials to prove if the movies were produced in L.A. County or elsewhere because producers often do not apply for filming licenses. In a memo to supervisors on Sept. 17, health officials warned that such an effort would be costly because the Public Health Department would need to identify filming sites and monitor compliance, which would require significant staff time.
"We worked closely with county counsel trying to see if there's some other way that we could effectively do this under existing authority, and . . . basically, we're unlikely to have an effective approach to prevent them from acquiring preventable STDs," Fielding said Tuesday. "It's very disturbing to come to that conclusion, but we also have to be realistic."
Add your comment
Latest
Popular
Tags
Opinion & Blogs
Analysis: Merkel under pressure to ra...
As an age of austerity looms for some of Germany's poorest citizens, pressure i...

![I need a copy of the Internet [CARTOON]](/images/en/7659_t.gif)
![Brilliant Nikon ad [PHOTO]](/images/en/7617_t.jpg)
![Funny food art [PHOTO]](/images/en/7538_t.jpg)
![Couch Surfing [PHOTO]](/images/en/7521_t.jpg)
![Girl looking bored with hype around Obama [PHOTO]](/images/en/7506_t.jpg)
![Drunk British students run amok during spring break in Spanish town [PHOTO]](/images/en/7492_t.jpg)
![Japanese monkeys in snowball fight [PHOTO]](/images/en/7401_t.jpg)



![Beautiful Pieces of Edible Art [Photo]](/images/en/7257_t.jpg)
![Jessica Simpson Meets Long-Neck Karen Women in Thailand [Photo]](/images/en/7251_t.jpg)










